Friday, October 21, 2005

And some really still wonder why we're hated...

Torturing prisoners was 'stress relief'

Torture of Iraqis was for 'stress relief', say US soldiers

For the first time, American soldiers who personally tortured Iraqi prisoners have come forward to give testimony to human rights organisations about crimes they committed.

"To ‘fuck a PUC’ means to beat him up. We would give them blows to the head, chest, legs and stomach, pull them down, kick dirt on them. This happened every day. To ‘smoke’ someone is to put them in stress positions until they get muscle fatigue and pass out. That happened every day."

"Some days we would just get bored so we would have everyone sit in a corner and then make them get in a pyramid. We did that for amusement."

The 82nd Airborne soldiers at FOB Mercury earned the nickname “The Murderous Maniacs” from local Iraqis and took the moniker as a badge of honour.

And they're suprised at the treatment of captured Americans?

Soldiers and their commanders have been executed for this kind of behaviour in the past, but Amerika has excused itself from guilt for war crimes. What with being The New Master Race ('cept for all the black people) and all.

this is why I'm so loathe to read the newspaper...

Another way to allow the continued molestation of children???

from usatoday 2 weeks ago:

Vatican enjoys foreign immunity in abuse case

A federal judge in Kentucky has ruled that the Holy See is a foreign state that enjoys certain immunity protections, placing restrictions on a lawsuit by three men who allege the Vatican covered up the sexual abuse of children by priests.

This case is similar to one in Texas which names Joseph Ratzinger, now known as Pope Benedict XVI, as a defendant in a sex abuse case. The U.S. Justice Department told the court last month that the case should be dismissed because Benedict enjoys immunity as head of state of the Holy See. The judge in that case hasn't ruled.

Oh, what to do, what to do?

Thursday, October 20, 2005

'ligion, and all that jazz

I've realized that my non-denominational church has fully embraced a doctrine of fundamentalism; I am much more moderate (at times) and sometimes more rigid (but different than the party line) and open to learning and understanding new things (which they are as well, but only if the new things come from the mouth and mind of our Senior pastor).

Our senior pastor believes God speaks to him; he says he alone amongst us has the "anointing", and most in this congregation have read and believe that we shall not "touch Gods's anointed." Although I think that many take that passage out of context (mostly pastors trying to protect their actions and authority to do whatever they want to do), also I believe God speaks to Bishop. But I also believe God speaks to and through many of us; God speaks to me; God sent me to this town, in this time. I believe that too--but is it too much to accept that it is *God* who chooses those who are *open* to hearing "the voice of God?" And those are placed all over this world: some in the same town, in the same parish, and yes, some in the same congregation? And just 'cause He's talking to you today, it doesn't preclude Him from speaking to JimmyJoe or Shanika tonight...

I have already experienced feeling outcast by my church and pastor; many may have similar thoughts or beliefs, but we have set up a construct where we are not free to express anything that might be perceived as speaking against or even questioning the teachings of "God's anointed."

Now, because God made me the way I am, and I still think and process information with this God-given brain, I *do* question things; I *do* need to speak out at times; and I *may* say some things that will not be well-received. I feel I shall soon be uncovered and labeled as some sort of gnostic rabble rouser and kicked out for some church-defined heresy. But I'll soldier on...'cause God told me to.



Posted by Picasa

sissun, universal woman! Posted by Picasa

Who is Jim Crow, and what is he to You??

(excerpted from an earlier discussion log concerning racial/social relationships)

...This discussion has brought to mind something my pastor says fairly regularly: "Satan is always looking for that particular person, place or thing that will take you out of the will of God." For Anakin Skywalker (Darth Vader), it was his pride and love for his wife that finally took him over to the dark side. What is it for you?

Well, it might just be that the shared-racial/social memory of the pain and horror of conditions in our part of the world under the peculiar institution of slavery [not to mention these long, dark years of "freedom"] and the fear, that barely lies under the surface for many of us, that it will return, stronger than ever is the "thing" for many of us.

As we chatted online or off, I could sense a greater welling up of emotion in my friends than in any other conversation I can recall having ... ever.

Except in 2001 when, standing in the vestibule of the Stevens Center in Winston-Salem, NC after a super-fantastic showing of Lonely Teardrops: the Jackie Wilson Story, I saw the face and heard the words of my mother as she explained why the show had been *no fun* at all for her.

You see, sixty-five years ago, the Stevens Center, a remarkably well-restored and maintained city landmark, had been called the "Carolina Theater"; in my mom's youth, it was *the* neighborhood movie theater. And like many other theaters and social institutions of that era, the Carolina observed the etiquette and upheld the codes of black and white society: Jim Crow ruled our world. So that meant that in order to see the film showing that week, mom and her sister would go to the ticket window to purchase their special tickets (child, "colored"); then instead of walking into the movie, they had to go back outside and around the back of the building to find the rickety iron fire-escape; then in fair weather or foul, up, up, up, up, up they climbed to the top-most floor to gain entry into the real peanut gallery: the "colored section". The disrespect, pain and humiliation that defined that era and informed her childhood had sprung to back to life, full-blown, in the moments she entered the theatre. She had vowed to herself to *never* return to this place--and in some way, by walking into that place again, she had betrayed herself and the memory of the people who had struggled all those many years to renounce Jim Crow all at the same time.

And I, her child, raised in the north in an enlightened, but still slightly bent, version of integration, had never really understood her militance, her experience, her pain. But in that one evening, she successfully communicated all of it to me.
I am humbled and chastened by the knowledge.

affairs of the heart...

... I overheard someone asking, "have you ever been with someone who made violins play in your head?" and I thought, "mmmmph, oh yes! and it was a full orchestra and chorus! and then I felt so sad, because this person, who made this music play inside of me, with whom I felt absolutely fearless and in whose presence I felt lifted from the surface of earth, alas, was not to be mine...funny how that works out....

(This entry was originally published earlier elsewhere...)

Can our pursuit of a personal relationship with God make us insensitive to other people? (part I)

I was enjoying an impromptu luncheon with colleagues at the small, southeastern university where I work the other day when one of the scattering of conversations turned to the subject of how we speak to one another and how we respond when our feelings get hurt by the words of others. One professor remarked that she knew she had a very sharp tongue, (a fact all too well known to many of us in the room) but was making real efforts to control what she said.

She shared a recent personal circumstance where she was the recipient of harsh personal criticism from a close, long time friend (you know, one of those loved ones who really know exactly how to push our buttons), but contrary to her usual and natural instincts, she *chose* not to respond to the criticism emotionally and kept her peace. Some of us thought this would have been an instance when use of her verbal skills was in fact warranted, but she thought not.

Now she and the friend are both professing Christians, but seemed to be in quite different worlds when it comes to the expression of that belief. She then told of the subsequent Sunday church meeting (with this same friend) wherein the basic message was "no pain, no gain", based on some scripture she quoted, (that admittedly, I did not catch--maybe Romans 5:3, maybe not) which seemed to validate the appropriateness of her choice. And she praised God and exalted his name because of this. She claimed to be fully engaged in the praise and worship, while her friend seemed totally unaffected--in stark contrast to her ebullient expressions in a very non-sacred setting the day before.


Everyone of us gathered became interested when I asked: "do you really believe that? and do you believe it applies across the board?", referring to the precept of no pain = no progress. I definitely don't believe this applies wholesale to our life experiences and, being relatively new at this Christian thing, I really wanted clarification.

to be continued in part II...

My Own Private KatRita

(originally published elsewhere in early October)

....and the winds blew and the rains came and the land as we knew it vanished from sight (or less pretentiously, it huffed, and it puffed, and it blew my damn basement wall down!)

The upside: my roof held. many of those horrid, bigassscary, mutant spiders drowned. the sun shone once more.

The downside: water gushing through my house at the speed of sound, carrying with it snakes, rats, and other creatures that evoke in me the primal response of "get me a stick so I can bash its head!" Worrying that my beloved butnotAMac computer would be a casualty of the resulting power issues (or worse, would be swept away in the rushing flood!) MOLD!!!! Mildew!! Missing another opportunity to give away this stuff I keep collecting -- now it's useless to everyone! STANK, Stink, stunk...

living in the path of swelling underground springs (plumbers theory, not mine) is not a good thing. I should raze the house, dig a well, and start my own bottled water business!

day one....

... of my unofficial start of web blogging; I've attempted blogging elsewhere, but for some reason, it seemed confusing, unrewarding, and very unsatisfying. but I've got a good feeling about this blogger.com page...

So, I'm gonna paste in some stuff I wrote earlier to jumpstart this puppy!

Monday, October 17, 2005

The UN and the Declaration of Human Rights




On December 10, 1948 the General Assembly of the United Nations adopted and proclaimed the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Following this historic act, the Assembly called upon all Member countries to publicize the text of the Declaration and "to cause it to be disseminated, displayed, read and expounded principally in schools and other educational institutions, without distinction based on the political status of countries or territories."

Do you remember seeing it posted in your school? Do you remember reading it or having it read to you? Well, having had the "privilege" (according to my dad) of growing up and going to school in NYC, I do. And we had *many* class trips to the UN from grades 1-7, aimed primarily at showing us an environment composed of people from diverse cultures working together towards common goals [much like our class, which looking back, really was very diverse]; exposing us to limited views on what "bad things" were happening around the globe -- but certainly not in our fair city/country; and teaching us that it's really a small world after all--and all the kids in the world, if we took a stand together on a single night, could make one hell of a killing Trick or Treating for UNICEF! (remember the blue coin cans, huh?).

We seemed to stop going to the UN with the school by the 8th grade; maybe they thought we'd grasped it by then...leaving those of us in the advanced placement classes way too much free time to figure out and implement methods of torturing our "less fortunate" and younger schoolmates. mmmm, OK, so maybe we hadn't grasped the *intended* concepts at all.

But, as usual, I digress. I have posted below, for the record and for anyone interested in refreshing their memory, the full text of the Declaration of Human Rights:


Adopted and proclaimed by General Assembly resolution 217 A (III) of 10 December 1948
PREAMBLE

Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world,

Whereas disregard and contempt for human rights have resulted in barbarous acts which have outraged the conscience of mankind, and the advent of a world in which human beings shall enjoy freedom of speech and belief and freedom from fear and want has been proclaimed as the highest aspiration of the commonpeople,

Whereas it is essential, if man is not to be compelled to have recourse, as a last resort, to rebellion against tyranny and oppression, that human rights should be protected by the rule of law,

Whereas it is essential to promote the development of friendly relations between nations,

Whereas the peoples of the United Nations have in the Charter reaffirmed their faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person and in the equal rights of men and women and have determined to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom,

Whereas Member States have pledged themselves to achieve, in co-operation with the United Nations, the promotion of universal respect for and observance of human rights and fundamental freedoms,

Whereas a common understanding of these rights and freedoms is of the greatest importance for the full realization of this pledge,

Now, Therefore, THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY proclaims THIS UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations, to the end that every individual and every organ of society, keeping this Declaration constantly in mind, shall strive by teaching and education to promote respect for these rights and freedoms and by progressive measures, national and international, to secure their universal and effective recognition and observance, both among the peoples of Member States themselves and among the peoples of territories under their jurisdiction.

Article 1.

    All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.

Article 2.

    Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty.

Article 3.

    Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.

Article 4.

    No one shall be held in slavery or servitude; slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms.

Article 5.

    No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.

Article 6.

    Everyone has the right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law.

Article 7.

    All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination.

Article 8.

    Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or by law.

Article 9.

    No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest, detention or exile.

Article 10.

    Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and obligations and of any criminal charge against him.

Article 11.

    (1) Everyone charged with a penal offence has the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law in a public trial at which he has had all the guarantees necessary for his defence.
    (2) No one shall be held guilty of any penal offence on account of any act or omission which did not constitute a penal offence, under national or international law, at the time when it was committed. Nor shall a heavier penalty be imposed than the one that was applicable at the time the penal offence was committed.

Article 12.

    No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.

Article 13.

    (1) Everyone has the right to freedom of movement and residence within the borders of each state.
    (2) Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country.

Article 14.

    (1) Everyone has the right to seek and to enjoy in other countries asylum from persecution.
    (2) This right may not be invoked in the case of prosecutions genuinely arising from non-political crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.

Article 15.

    (1) Everyone has the right to a nationality.
    (2) No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his nationality nor denied the right to change his nationality.

Article 16.

    (1) Men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion, have the right to marry and to found a family. They are entitled to equal rights as to marriage, during marriage and at its dissolution.
    (2) Marriage shall be entered into only with the free and full consent of the intending spouses.
    (3) The family is the natural and fundamental group unit of society and is entitled to protection by society and the State.

Article 17.

    (1) Everyone has the right to own property alone as well as in association with others.
    (2) No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property.

Article 18.

    Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance.

Article 19.

    Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.

Article 20.

    (1) Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and association.
    (2) No one may be compelled to belong to an association.

Article 21.

    (1) Everyone has the right to take part in the government of his country, directly or through freely chosen representatives.
    (2) Everyone has the right of equal access to public service in his country.
    (3) The will of the people shall be the basis of the authority of government; this will shall be expressed in periodic and genuine elections which shall be by universal and equal suffrage and shall be held by secret vote or by equivalent free voting procedures.

Article 22.

    Everyone, as a member of society, has the right to social security and is entitled to realization, through national effort and international co-operation and in accordance with the organization and resources of each State, of the economic, social and cultural rights indispensable for his dignity and the free development of his personality.

Article 23.

    (1) Everyone has the right to work, to free choice of employment, to just and favourable conditions of work and to protection against unemployment.
    (2) Everyone, without any discrimination, has the right to equal pay for equal work.
    (3) Everyone who works has the right to just and favourable remuneration ensuring for himself and his family an existence worthy of human dignity, and supplemented, if necessary, by other means of social protection.
    (4) Everyone has the right to form and to join trade unions for the protection of his interests.

Article 24.

    Everyone has the right to rest and leisure, including reasonable limitation of working hours and periodic holidays with pay.

Article 25.

    (1) Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age or other lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond his control.
    (2) Motherhood and childhood are entitled to special care and assistance. All children, whether born in or out of wedlock, shall enjoy the same social protection.

Article 26.

    (1) Everyone has the right to education. Education shall be free, at least in the elementary and fundamental stages. Elementary education shall be compulsory. Technical and professional education shall be made generally available and higher education shall be equally accessible to all on the basis of merit.
    (2) Education shall be directed to the full development of the human personality and to the strengthening of respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms. It shall promote understanding, tolerance and friendship among all nations, racial or religious groups, and shall further the activities of the United Nations for the maintenance of peace.
    (3) Parents have a prior right to choose the kind of education that shall be given to their children.

Article 27.

    (1) Everyone has the right freely to participate in the cultural life of the community, to enjoy the arts and to share in scientific advancement and its benefits.
    (2) Everyone has the right to the protection of the moral and material interests resulting from any scientific, literary or artistic production of which he is the author.

Article 28.

    Everyone is entitled to a social and international order in which the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration can be fully realized.

Article 29.

    (1) Everyone has duties to the community in which alone the free and full development of his personality is possible.
    (2) In the exercise of his rights and freedoms, everyone shall be subject only to such limitations as are determined by law solely for the purpose of securing due recognition and respect for the rights and freedoms of others and of meeting the just requirements of morality, public order and the general welfare in a democratic society.
    (3) These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.

Article 30.

    Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or to perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein.

So go, visit the UN site and refresh your own recollections: UN Website